looks nice. colorblindtest style could maybe get more with using a real colorblind effect.

but i also understandt the concept what is in description.
good work anyway

you can refer another project called “virus” on his blog.
http://blog.pixelspectrum.net/design/virus/
I suppose this page is more appropriate to refer to.

I like the idea of different perspetive which is connected to colour blindness. On one hand the blindness is an ‘error’, but on the other hand blindness against ‘terror’ occurs if you see someone with your intention or some other purpose to make them as ‘terror’.

I didn’t get the real connotation of your work.

To Parasite:
I have tried several color variations and print it out in different sizes but for some king of reason it doesn’t work. Probably it should be presented on white background. But after that it looks like medical tool rather than poster.
Thanks

To Fumi:
I know project Virus very well I have been part of it for a while, but project that I have mentioned was made long time a go – maybe it wasn’t that famous but for sure it was much better.

I’m sorry to hear that “you don’t get the connotation of my work”. I though that its so obvious and self-evident. This is interesting – really. I’ll have some further question later on if you don’t mind.

Thanks.

well, I know the difference between “error” and “mistake” in Linguistic studies. So, I understand that colour blindness is an “error” inside you and you cannot avoid not to be so. But then I could not apply the same idea to the “war” which is always made by some countries with hidden reason and intention.

This is why I didn’t understand the meaning of your work.

I don’t think you are right! I mean in posters itself are basically two messages. Visual and linguistic. Am I right!

To Tomas

I am not an expert in design, only in Linguistics and International relations since I had finished my degrees. I couldn’t get the two meanings. It felt bit strange and had to think over and over.
Simply, for me it wasn’t obvious messages.

Even if I was not correct, I don’t mind being said “you’re wong”, but I need a clearer explanation. If you are thinking that I am just criticising Givision, that is absolutely incorrect. I know him, therefore I want to know prefessional work and its meanings.

To GON

I am still stuck in my thoughts.
I am not an expert in design, but I would like to know the meaning of “visual” meaning of your works.

Thanks.

Wow! It’s look as a serious problem now.
It’s not rocky surgery guys!

Well Fumi (one of my close friends) is a bit right otherwise I think Tomas find the connection between visual message and linguistic phrase.

First message can be viewed as a disproportion between physical testing people, if they have mono, di, trichromacy and what they really see. All of this facing to contrast with War.

Secound message could be viewed as a playing with words as the …chromacy is. In that case people can see number, can see glyphs as well as some tools “some errors”. This tools we priory regard as tools of wars – and that become error which I thing can not be commute with mistake – sorry.

It’s not defect of observing problems it’s a problem of thinking itself – and this should be a main message which I have trying to transfer – hope it works for you now.

Finally on the end
“if the message is obvious in first observation – where is the main differences between the paintings and packaging design in supermarket” so many things can have a secound even third level of information – otherwise we don’t have any art to enjoy.

Thank you for your comments

For me it’s clear ‘-) I didn’t want to upset you friend sorry mate!
Tom